Register  Login
Blog
 
Introducing Kate Hardy...
Location: BlogsJessica Hart - 50 heroes, 50 heroines...50 happy endings!    
Posted by: Jessica Sunday, March 02, 2008

It’s time for another guest blog, and I’m enormously pleased to welcome now Kate Hardy, winner of the this year’s Romance Prize.  Kate has come down to earth long enough to tell us about her new book, Sold to the Highest Bidder , which is also out this March, and about her writing in general.  I’ve always liked Kate, ever since she foolishly admitted to thinking that I was glamorous (I was two sizes smaller then) so she is clearly a very, very nice person.  She is also a very successful one, with a writing schedule that puts mine to shame.  Not only does she write for two romance lines – Medical and Modern Extra - she also writes local history books, instead of just talking about it, the way I do, and that’s apart from bringing up a family and everything that goes along with that.  I can do intimidated too, Kate! 

Anyway, (cue drumroll) here is Kate herself....

I’m truly delighted to be celebrating the publication of Jessica’s 50th book. That’s a fabulous milestone: and I know just how much work goes into creating a short romantic novel with believable characters and a good plot. Every word has to carry its weight, moving the plot forward and the characters together. And Jessica does it so well – not only do her readers love her work, but she’s won critical acclaim, too, with several awards to her credit. I was privileged to be on the shortlist with her in 2006 for the RNA Romance Prize (and I was on her table, too, so I could clap REALLY loudly!).

The first time I met Jessica, I was incredibly intimidated by her.  It was my first Mills & Boon author lunch, so I was feeling a bit overawed to start with… and then I saw this incredibly glamorous woman in a gorgeous red dress, with matching shoes to die for and perfect hair. She was terrifying.


At a different author lunch, we started chatting, and I discovered that actually (despite being beautiful and glamorous) she was really nice and we had absolutely tons in common. Dogs. Music. A love of history. (I should mention here, I’m also very proud of Jessica for getting her PhD.) I think if we lived nearer each other we’d be terribly bad influences on each other (lunch, shoes, lunch, chocolate… you get the idea). And I think we also have similar methods of working, in that personal experiences spark off ideas. I can’t claim to have walked barefoot on the exotic beaches that Jessica has (!), but my latest release, Sold to the Highest Bidder, has a lot of personal things in it.

I think one of the fun parts about writing is taking something personal as a springboard, and then taking it further. Starting with the house: it’s actually an amalgam of several houses. The exterior belongs to a house in Norfolk which I would dearly, dearly love to buy (but, as my husband pointed out, apart from the fact it’s outside our budget, a moat does not go well with two inquisitive children and an even more inquisitive spaniel); the vegetable garden belongs to Oxburgh Hall (one of my favourite National Trust properties; I could really imagine living there); and the rhododendrons and lake belong to Blickling Hall (where we’ve spent a lot of time as a family, wandering through the gardens and feeding the geese at the lake – even my wallpaper on my computer is a picture of my husband and children sitting by said lake). With the exception of the library (borrowed in part from Blickling, when it was being restored), the interior of the house is all my imagination – as are the four-poster and the renovation plans.

Although I write for two very different lines – Modern Heat and Medical Romance – I do have a similar approach to both, in that I use real life as a springboard. A Baby of Her Own, my very first M&B, started life at my daughter’s bedside in hospital (her first Christmas, aged 7 weeks – but there is a happy ending in that the book was accepted on her first birthday and published on her second. She’s now 7 and very savvy: she claims that, as she’s the originator of my career at M&B, I owe her royalties… and she’s happy to be paid in chocolate and shoes!). I also do quite a bit of research, which has to be accurate – for Medical Romances, clearly the research is into medical conditions, symptoms and treatments, whereas in Modern Heat the research has varied from how to do latte art (for Breakfast at Giovanni’s – best excuse ever for touring cafes) through to architecture (The Cinderella Project), how to make a firework (Seeing Stars – and that started in ‘real life’, when I was organising our school’s firework display), and meteorology (One Night, One Baby).

Jessica asked me to talk about what it’s like, writing for two such different lines – and originally, I thought I probably did write differently for each line. Then I thought about it some more, and I realised that although the lines are very different, the way I write my books still has a lot in common. With Medical Romance, the medical bits have to drive the story forward or shed light on characters – it’s part of the setting and part of the romance. With Modern Heat, my nerdy tecchy bits either drive the story forward or shed light on the characters, too. With Medical Romance, you need a real-world feel and lots of secondary characters (your hero and heroine are medics, so they have to see patients!), whose job is to shed light on the characters or help move the story forward; with Modern Heat, I tend to have secondaries who do the same thing (again, using Giovanni as an example – his big, noisy Italian family have an important part to play in the story).

Settings, then. Surely it has to be settings. Modern Heat is meant to be sassy and stylish and urban. A lot of mine are set in London – but my hospital books tend to be set in a big city, too. My country GP practices have a Modern Heat parallel: Sold to the Highest Bidder is set in a country house. (I bent the rules a bit. Country house isn’t urban – but it is stylish…)

Sensuality levels? Medical Romances are regarded as ‘tender’ in the US and ‘sweet’ in the UK, and Modern Heat (as the name suggests) sizzles. Hmm. I think my sensuality levels are broadly similar in both lines – I don’t close the bedroom door in my Medicals. I did try writing one where they didn’t have sex for most of the book (Their Very Special Marriage), but I found it quite difficult as my characters, um, like going to bed with each other. I’m possibly a little more adventurous with the settings of my love scenes in Modern Heat (hmm – how am I going to top the tractor scene in Sold to the Highest Bidder?), but then again saying that is probably going to prompt me into doing something different with a Medical!

How about alpha heroes? Surely the Modern Heat hero is more alpha? Hmm. My editor says that the Kate Hardy alpha hero is clever, with a big heart. Which fits both lines.

At the end of the day, a romance novel is about character, conflict and a satisfying resolution. So I’m beginning to think that it doesn’t really matter which line an author writes for: it’s the voice that’s important. I’d be just as happy reading a Historical or a Modern or a Medical by Jessica Hart as I would a Romance, because even though the lines are nominally different (Historicals being set before the second world war, Modern being international glamour, Medical being set in a medical setting and Romance being ‘sweet’), if the name ‘Jessica Hart’ was on the cover I’d know exactly what to expect: a book with warm, realistic characters, a great sense of humour, and little details that stick in the memory for years.

Congrats again on your 50th book, Jessica. And I look forward to toasting your achievement at the M&B party in September!

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (33)   Add Comment
Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Many apologies for the technical hiccups yesterday, but I'm delighted you're here at last, Kate! Now, where to start ....? Perhaps by telling you first how very much I enjoyed Sold to the Highest Bidder. I particularly liked the strong sense of place in the book - I could picture the house so clearly that it's hard to believe that it doesn't in fact exist! And Norfolk sounds wonderful, in spite of the very strange picture on the cover. I wonder who decided you had mountains down there??? The cover reminds me of a medieval painting where you glimpse a symbolic landscape through a window. Perhaps there's more to these covers than we think. It's not too hard to read some sexual symbolism in the thick forest (again, so typically Norfolk!) and the thrusting mountain. Not sure if one could do the same for the cover of Promoted: to Wife and Mother ... all that sleeting rain are the problems of everyday life, maybe, the umbrella the shelter of love ... and now I come to think of it, perhaps the lovingly rendered steps behind them (why???) represent the stages of their relationship! I'm often baffled by the amount of detail that goes into the background, but I might start looking at my covers in a new light now!<br><br>I've got to dash now, but will be back later, as much to say about fantasies!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Thank you, Jessica - and it's lovely to be here! As for the intimidation... Kate Walker calls me 'Scary Kate'. (It's affectionate. But she won't be budged: she says I'm scary because of my writing schedule.) I thoroughly enjoyed 'Promoted: to Wife and Mother', though it wasn't so much the scenery that grabbed me - it was the vivid characterisation. Perdita the Peacock (I loved the way you got it to run through the whole book). I can really identify with the outdoor course at the moment as my son's on his first residential school trip, doing precisely that. (And it was hailing last night...) And I think you've really captured the tricky juggling act our generation has to perform: torn between caring for our children, caring for our parents, and somehow trying to keep our own lives going at the same time. I'm so glad you enjoyed the sense of place in 'Sold to the Highest Bidder'. Norfolk is indeed a wonderful place. I would hate to live anywhere else (except, perhaps, York - which has many similarities with Norwich). The mountain... ah, yes. We had a lot of fun with that when I did an interview on on BBC Radio Norfolk, trying to work out where it was. Our highest point is 200m above sea level. Hardly mountainous! We do have ancient woodlands around here (the Babes in the Wood tale comes from this area), but what you're more likely to see are fields of corn, with lots of poppies in harvest time, and even more churches. (Tell me off if I start talking about churches. Must put my romance hat on. Not chunter on about lovely, lovely medieval churches with wall paintings and... oh-h-h. Lightbulb. Supposing my next heroine restored medieval wall paintings for a living?)

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Just back from wearing my medieval hat (how's that for a segue?) so will look forward to your painting restorer, Kate! Although in my experience medievalists are not a very romantic lot - you may have to make your hero a man of the present! I must confess that I know shamefully little about medieval churches (but if you ever want to know anything about medieval rubbish disposal for a book, I'm your gal). Anyway back at the books, I was thinking about the differences between the lines as I was reading Sold to the HIghest Bidder. I'm inclined to agree with you that the individual author's voice is what distinguishes a book rather than the line it's in. Obviously the sex scenes make a difference (and Jack and Alicia on the tractor is indeed one to remember!) but to be honest the 'hotter' lines never have quite as much sex as I'm expecting them to. They're still about character and resolving issues, just as you say. I wonder if the real difference between the lines is that they appeal to different kinds of fantasies? So I read Sold to the Highest Bidder as a sexual fantasy, the one where a gorgeous man tells you that he wants you and is going to have you and it's going to be fantastic - and it is (and as fantasies go, it's certainly a winner!) I thought it was interesting that Alicia has to make that choice herself; in the Modern/Presents sheikh stories I've read, for instance, the heroine, for whatever reason, doesn't have that choice. So she gets the incredible lover but doesn't have to accept any responsibility - the fantasy is forced on her. Or maybe the real fantasy is not having to take responsibility in a relationship? Perdita's fantasy is more of an emotional one: finding someone who will help you bear your responsibilities, who won't let you do it on your own. Promoted; to Wife and Mother deals with issues that many of us face, and in lots of ways it is, I hope, "realistic", but it IS still a fantasy. It would be interesting to know whether readers tend to stick to one particular fantasy (i.e. just read within one line) or read across the lines depending on what they feel like at any particular time. When you hear from readers, do they tell you whether they read Kate Hardy Medicals or Kate Hardy Modern Extra, or do you get the sense that it's Kate Hardy they look for, and that the line doesn't matter?

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Laura Vivanco on Thursday, March 06, 2008
"It would be interesting to know whether readers tend to stick to one particular fantasy (i.e. just read within one line) or read across the lines depending on what they feel like at any particular time." I wouldn't describe each line as being about a particular "fantasy." For me the differences between the lines quite often has something to do with the settings, but often it's also about the different types of characters you'd expect to find there, and the types of conflicts/issues they'll have to deal with. And like you say, Jessica, some lines tend to be more "realistic" than others. That said, some of the lines are much more varied than others. I'm thinking in particular of the historicals, though I think it might be true of the medicals too. I think it could be that because the setting is what really defines the line (i.e. the historical or medical background), there's less insistence on particular types of characters. But I'd never expect to find a Modern hero in the Romance line. You can have sheiks and billionaires in both lines, but their personalities will be different. And that's something that's fairly clear when you read the guidelines for each of those lines. So far I haven't read in a great many of the Harlequin lines. I've mainly stuck to the UK-edited lines, because they're the ones that are easiest to get hold of in my local library and in the shops. So it's mostly M&B Romance, Historical, Modern, Mod Extras/Heat and Medicals that I've read. quot;to be honest the 'hotter' lines never have quite as much sex as I'm expecting them to. They're still about character and resolving issues" As far as I can remember, I think it was only when I started doing my research more thoroughly and looked at the guidelines that I actually realised that there aren't explicit sex scenes in the Romance line. So I'm probably not best placed to comment on the relative amount of sex in the various lines ;-)

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Amy Andrews on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Er Kate, are we forgetting the Thames lamp post scene? That one's burned into my memory forever. Very, very hot! Interesting thoughts on voice. I would have thought that the voice was different for each line too but now I'm changing my mind.....Congrats Jessica on your 50! As someone who's just completed her 15th I am in awe!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Michelle Styles on Thursday, March 06, 2008
I think there is a certain core voice because authors are drawn to particular themes, words and ideas. however I do think there are also subtle changes. I know my editors tell me that I have different voices for different time periods. And my Regency/Victorian voice is different from say my Viking voice. But I suspect that is more to do with the subject matter. very difficult to get a sword battles and hostage taking in a Victorian... And there are certain readers who will only read in one time period...although one does hope...I know as a reader that I don't stick to one theme or even one fantasy. There have been times that I have shown a marked preferance for one sort of book. (ie I can remember inhaling Greek heroes when I was a teenager). And now you have me wondering about some of the clues in my covers. But as acover basically creates a mood, I am a little wary...

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Nice segue, Jessica :o) Not sure I'd get away with a painting restorer, as I had to fight quite hard for an archaeologist hero. Really interesting thoughts about fantasies. I think as I'm a control freak (I admit it, even) as well as juggling a lot of things in life, my fantasy is someone helping me juggle rather than take over completely. So I'm more drawn to the emotional fantasies than the intense ones where the hero sweeps the heroine off her feet and does everything for her. Having said that, I tend to read across the lines - I choose by author rather than by line. I'm not sure whether my readers do the same as I haven't had any real feedback on which they prefer, my Medicals or the Modern Heats. Very interesting, too, Laura, about the types of conflicts differing between the lines. I hadn't really considered that before - but yes, a blackmail plot wouldn't work in Romance. Agree with you that Medicals and Historicals are more varied because the line is defined by the setting. Michelle has a good point too about some readers liking particular time periods; it's the same with Medicals in that readers like certain medical settings. They like the hospital books but not the family doctor ones, or they like the ones set in maternity or a children's ward but not A&E. Amy, LOL about the lamp post scene. I think you'll enjoy the tractor...What defines an author's voice, though? Interesting thought about it including particular words, Michelle. I know I have to do a "search and replace" for certain phrases I overuse :o)

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Julie Cohen on Thursday, March 06, 2008
I have to say I haven't noticed a big change in voice between your Meds and Modern Heats, Pam. I think they have the same sorts of characters and emotions, although the content may be a bit different, and they're books that only YOU could have written. I think a reader who picks up a Kate Hardy knows that she'll get an emotional, feelgood read, with really sympathetic heroines and heroes, and she'll also learn something along the way! I have to say, though, that I always get caught up in the story so I don't really analyse voice! I think that my voice does change a bit from my M&Bs to my Little Black Dress books, even in things like sentence structure and vocabulary. And I write love scenes a bit differently. I actually reread one of my M&Bs the other day and was a bit shocked by how different it seems to what I'm doing now. But again I'd hope that readers could crossover with no blips, and probably nobody else would ever notice. Congratulations on fifty books, Jessica! How amazing are you!??!!? And very glamorous.

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Well, I stick by my fantasy theory, Laura, buckle and thong, in Georgette Heyer's wonderful phrase, but perhaps we're just using different words for the same idea. When you say a Romance sheikh is different from a Presents sheikh because of his personality, surely the hero's personality is part of the fantasy? However, I will concede settings do make a difference to the tone of a book. That probably explains why I'm not generally drawn to Presents/Modern - stylish, jet-setting locations just don't do it for me. As regular readers of this blog will know, I'm more of a wild landscape girl (there's a fabulous photo of the Guyana rainforest going up on the Where are you? page soon, and that makes my heart beat a million times faster than the places where the rich and famous cluster). Do we need to know more about this lamp post, Kate??? Do you find it easy to write about sex? I really struggle with it, I have to confess. The 'closing of the bedroom door' in the Romance line was such a relief to me! I have a couple of very tattered sheets of paper typed up in London nearly 20 years ago which is covered with any possible word I might use when describing sex, and I still refer to it all the time when I'm writing. The thought of a search and replace in my own books makes me cringe - I'd be absolutely mortified, I think!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Amy Andrews on Wednesday, March 05, 2008
Well I've definitely got to get my hands on that tractor scene. Having first hand experience of getting passionate in the cab of a tractor I'm dying to see how you pull it off (absolutely no puns intended).

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Laura Vivanco on Thursday, March 06, 2008
"Well, I stick by my fantasy theory, Laura, buckle and thong, in Georgette Heyer's wonderful phrase, but perhaps we're just using different words for the same idea". We might well be. I think I have a bit of a knee-jerk disinclination to use the word "fantasy" when talking about romance because it seems so closely linked to the term "sexual fantasy", which then creates mental associations for me with the many comments about romance being "porn for women." Not that there's anything wrong with there being sexual fantasies in the novels, but when people start on the "porn" description, they 're very often being dismissive and implying that the books are nothing but sexual fantasy, devoid of any good writing, characterisation etc. & I get the impression you're using "fantasy" in a very different sense, possibly meaning "things one would like to have but which don't seem entirely likely to happen often, if at all, in real life." But then again, I generally don't think of the heroines as having something I'd want. So even with that definition I'm still not reading the books as fantasies. Julie, re "I actually reread one of my M&Bs the other day and was a bit shocked by how different it seems to what I'm doing now. But again I'd hope that readers could crossover with no blips, and probably nobody else would ever notice." I've tried reading quite a few LBDs, and they feel "chick lit" to me (some more than others). There's something about them which makes them feel different to most of the M&Bs I've read. Admittedly the Modern Extra/Heat line is the line that's most similar to the LBDs I've read, (the ages of the characters, and them often being young professionals) but I still feel a difference. It's tricky to put it into words or give much evidence for it, but the LBDs seem to have a bit more emotional distance, like there's a bit more ironic detachment in the way that love's written about. M&Bs are so much more tightly focussed on the main couple and their feelings, even if that might come across as wallowing in emotion (well, the M&B tag line was "live the emotion!" for quite a while).

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Julie - thank you for the compliment :o) (The 'learning something' is going to stay in. I just have to be sneaky about it. I swear I will resurrect the microwave grape racing in another book. I need a scientist hero.) I think in this business our writing tends to change - the books I was writing five years ago are a fair way away from what I'm writing now. It's a mixture I think of growing as a writer and also moving with the times, as I believe M&B's contemporary romances reflect the concerns of the ages. (So the ones from this decade are very different from those written in the 90s, in tone and style, which in turn differ from those written in the 80s, the 70s, etc.). The lamp posts are the Vulliamy ones on the South Bank, Jessica - used in 'The Cinderella Project'. I set a love scene there; the hero and heroine were interrupted before it went too far . It carries on very nicely onto the tube train, involving the hero whispering a certain Donne poem to the heroine. (Sadly, one that's not on my 'Richard Burton reads Donne' CD. But I have a vivid imagination...). Do I find it easy to write about sex, Jessica? It depends on when and how I'm writing it. If it's during the day with no interruptions, that's fine. I can even dictate the scene into my computer (! yes, really). But if it's during the evening, when I'm likely to be overheard by small ears (or by a husband with very expressive eyebrows), I type it. I'm also more conscious of the possibility of someone coming in and reading the screen, so I don't relax as much - means that to write it I need a closed office door, headphones on and some mood-setting music. Oh, and chocolate, so I can distract any visitors to my office :o) I don't always write love scenes from the heroine's viewpoint; I quite enjoy using the hero's POV as a way of showing the hero's motivation and conflict. Amy - "Sold to the Highest Bidder" is out your way in two months' time. And it's a garden tractor, so it might not be quite as you're expecting! Laura - I know exactly what you mean re the "porn for women" reaction. The same uninformed opinion that dismisses romance as "all the same". I'll spare you the soapbox...Very interesting that you feel there's ironic detachment/chicklit feel to LBD: I think that's what the covers are saying, whereas M&B covers in the main are focused on the hero and heroine. (I'm aware that's a sweeping generalisation - and my last two Christmas books have had covers that don't reflect the book at all, i.e. a bauble and a Christmas tree!). You're absolutely right about the emotion in M&B. Emotional conflict is the key thing, and in most workshops I've seen by the editors they tend to say "emotion, emotion, emotion" as being the most important thing in the book/what they're looking for. I quite like that "live the emotion" tag: I think it's a pretty accurate way of describing the reader's experience.

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Thursday, March 06, 2008
I think that's exactly what I mean by fantasy, Laura - the idea that it's possible to impose some order and narrative structure on the chaos of life! But that applies to all romances, whatever the line. They all have a resolution of some kind, even if it's not always the perfect happy ever after. In fact, Ed, the hero of Promoted: to Wife and Mother, acknowledges at the end that the problems he and Perdita have been facing and which have caused the conflict between them aren't going to go away; the "fantasy" (or whatever you chooose to call it) is that they don't have to face them alone any more. And talking of resolution, did I miss something at the end of Sold to the Highest Bidder, Kate? I was so taken up with Jack's wonderfully romantic gesture (don't want to give away more than that) that it was only later I wondered how they were going to settle their disagreement about the garden. Did you deliberately leave that open, or did I just not read carefully enough? I loved the idea of you murmuring love scenes to your computer, chocolate to hand! I must try it, although I might substitute a glass of wine for the chocolate ... I've never tried dictating and can imagine finding it very awkward, although I know you're not the only author who manages it very successfully. For me the whole process of writing is bound up with my fingers moving over the keyboard and words emerging on the screen, often without apparently going through my head. I never dreamt when I did that extremely boring secretarial course all those years ago that learning how to touch type would come in so useful ... Next time I'm walking along the South Bank, I'll look at the lamp posts with a new eye! I shook my head when I saw the title of that book. The one I'm writing at the moment is going to be called Cinderella's Wedding Wish. When my editor suggested it, it was the first I'd heard of the Cinderella motif, but ever since then it seems as if every author but me has already done a Cinderella book. Can't quite shake the impression I'm panting along in the dust of a bandwagon that's already trundled past ...

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Amy Andrews on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Thanks Kate. It's on my to-buy list. Oooh, we have a garden tractor....or as we call them a ride-on. Hmm, it keeps getting better....I think LBD's definitely have a different voice and I agree with Laura it's more chick-litty, which I adore. But I think this gets down to readership. M&B readers, by and large, don't want that kind of dynamic they want the intense focus on the H&H. They want to "live the emotion" :-)

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Michelle Styles on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Ah Jessica's infamous tattered sheets of paper. When she spoke about them at the RNA conference several years ago, I must say that a light bulb went off in my head. I now have a notebook full of words that appeal to me for use use in sensual scenes. My latest discovery is thrum, courtesy of my last editor -- in the context of to sound with a montous hum/to play or pluck a stringed instrument., the sound of thrumming. It is always helpful to know what the words mean. The notebook makes it so much easier to find the exact word that I might need. And the ride on lawn mower/tractor scene is wonderful.

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Thursday, March 06, 2008
I deliberately left the garden disagreement open, Jessica - I think they'll come to some sort of compromise in the end. Re Cinderella - I do think that ideas float in the ether. My last MH was an archaeologist; at the same time, Liz Fielding was writing an archaeologist; and Nic Marsh has just sold her archaeologist MH... (So are we going to have lots of medieval wall-painting experts next? *g*) Amy - oh, dear. I could be putting ideas into your head :o) Michelle - would this be one of your Moleskine notebooks? I have tried working with notebooks in the past, but I tend to lose them. Or they get borrowed. I have one at the moment for my local history stuff, and halfway through there are some pages where certain people have been playing hangman. Sadly, no lightbulb words in there, though...

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Thursday, March 06, 2008
I'd forgotten I'd already confessed about my 'sex sheets', Michelle ... I was just talking a friend the other day about my inclination to give away too much information! But absolutely delighted to think it might have been helpful. 'Thrum' is on my list. It's a very evocative word, and I suspect I got it from Stella Riley, who wrote wonderful historicals set in the Civil War for Headline some years ago, and whose love scenes were beautifully done, I thought. I've got three of her books but have never been able to track down any more. Amy, your passionate encounter in the tractor cab reminded me of my own prediliction for beaten up vehicles, the result, I am sure, of my first 'proper' kiss, pressed up against a battered Land Rover - and in the desert, too! I've never got over it. If I look back at my books, I can see that the whole car thing - inside and out - is a recurrent motif. I'm told there are an awful lot of aprons in my stories too, although I refuse to see them as symbolic of domesticity. I just happen to like wearing a pinny when I'm cooking. And Natasha Oakley assures me I have a shoe fetish, although this is another one I don't really understand! I can't be the only one with a well-worn set of motifs, though .... can I??

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Thursday, March 06, 2008
I noticed the cardigans as well as the shoes. But DEFINITELY the shoes. :o) ;No, you're not the only one with motifs, Jessica. Mine are spaniels (hmm, wonder where that one comes from, cough - could it be the one snoring his head off next to my feet right now?), food, and quirky facts. (One in 'Sold to the Highest Bidder' was the fact there's a hebe in the bishop's garden at the Norwich cathedral which was grown from a cutting from Queen Victoria's wedding bouquet.) Thanks for the tip about Stella Riley - will have to look out for her. There don't seem to be many historicals set in the Civil War, and it's an interesting period. One of my favourite historicals - in fact, one of my top two favourite books of all time - is Diana Norman's 'The Vizard Mask'; the sense of place is astoundingly good, and her characterisation is fabulous. (The other one, since you're bound to ask, is George Eliot's 'The Mill on the Floss'. Typical Eliot with the love-versus-duty theme - one which I find myself using rather too much, but it's such an interesting one.)

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Thursday, March 06, 2008
And that;s incredibly cool, having your first kiss in the desert against a battered Land Rover. Dare I ask if a Sheik was involved? :o)

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Thursday, March 06, 2008
Cardigans???? Aaaarrrgh .... please tell me you're mixing me up with someone else!!! I noticed that bit about the hebe, and filed it away as an interesting fact - so Julie was right about always learning something from your stories! Your tip about Diana Norman has made me look out her 'The Morning Gift' which I haven't read for years but have kept because I remember enjoying it very much. That has a very strong sense of place too, in the Fens, so I'll search out The Vizard Mask. Will pass on Eliot, though. I've tried and I've tried with nineteenth-century novels, and I just can't come at them. I find them all so wordy and boring. Dickens, Trollope, Eliot, the Brontes ... if you ask me they could all do with a good edit and a bit of show not tell. My only exception to the C19th ban is Jane Austen, who is a) too brilliant to be compared and b) part of the long C18th anyway, I always think. No, sadly have never kissed a sheikh. The thing about sheikhs (at least in romances!) is that they're always rich, so he'd have had a swanky car, instead of a dusty Land Rover with metal dashboard, torn seats, dangling electrics and so on ... it wouldn't have had the same frisson at all!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Michelle Styles on Thursday, March 06, 2008
According to the yesterday's Telegraph, cardigans are in. Even David Beckham has been spotted wearing one. They are this year's hot item for men's fashion. Apparently Asda sold 226 k in January alone. More than they have sold in the last 3 years. And yes, Kate, I keep them in one of my Moleskines. I have a notebook just for the purpose of good words, and useful things like the stages of the courtship ritual which I always forget. (I also use it for doing my copy edits...) Unlike the other ones, this one is a reporter notebook type. Both my dh and my mother keep giving me them.. And I think there is far more frission with a dusky old land rover than a swanky sports car...I have to be in theright mood to enjoy 19th century novels. It has to do with omniscient narrator...

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Liz Fielding on Thursday, March 06, 2008
A somewhat belated congratulations on your 50th book, Jessica. So ... Where do you get your ideas from? <g> Kate, I really enjoyed your take on writing for two lines and how the similarities are greater than the differences. Ah, Moleskins, Michelle... I don't buy them because I can't bear to write in beautiful notebooks. <g>

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Amy Andrews on Friday, March 07, 2008
Well now Jessica, a pash in the desert against a beat-up landrover - sounds right up my alley. But I do have to admit to the tractor cab being air-conditioned :-) - well it was desert-like outside and ploughing a field is kind of boring.<br>Sorry, have to put Austen in the wordy/boring basket too. And now I have committed the ultimate romance faux par, I'll sign off.

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Friday, March 07, 2008
Nope - * pretty * cardigans, though. Cashmere, and the kind of lacy shrugs that M&S were selling at Christmas. But the shoes I notice more!<br><br>You could have a sheikh in disguise, with his battered Land Rover... (My next MH is a sheikh book so you're giving me some good ideas here - thanks!)<br><br>I agree that Dickens is too wordy - 'Little Dorrit' always sends me to sleep so I keep a copy for insomniac moments. But Hardy and Eliot, I love. (Austen - nope. Am with you there, Amy. Having said that, it's 15 years since I last tried to read Mansfield Park so I suppose I'm overdue another try to see if I've grown up enough to enjoy her...)<br><br>Michelle - Beckham in a cardi? Hmm. And I'd love to nose through your notebooks some day. I have to admit to keeping things on scrappy bits of paper which I'm always losing.<br><br>Liz - lovely to see you here. (And I have a feeling that this discussion is going to be very useful for ideas.)

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Michelle Styles on Friday, March 07, 2008
My moleskines have been as gifts, and both my dh and mother very pointedly said that they would far rather me to use the gifts than to have them mouldering in a drawer. Once they agreed that I could put coffee cups on them, take them places and that I might even lose them, I felt justified in writing in them. And it can be interesting to go back and look at what I was doing when...The problem I have is that I may write down ideas but when it comes to write the next book, it is often another idea that grips my imagination...<br>I think Austen et al have to be read when you are in the right mood for them. Sometimes a certain writer just grabs you and you know that you have to read more of her work.Othertimes, a universally loved author can leave you cold. That is one reason I think that it is great to have so many to choose from.... My fave Austen is Persuasion with P&P and Emma coming up after. I am not overly fond of S&S or Mansfield Park.

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Friday, March 07, 2008
Thanks, Liz - thank you all, in fact - but congratulations are, I'm afraid, premature. As always, I'm trailing behind you, and Promoted: to Wife and Mother is only my 48th book. My 50th isn't out until October, but never one to miss the opportunity to make a little fuss when a big one will do, I'm starting now ...<br><br>Disappointed to hear about the air-conditioning, Amy - I thought you Australians were tougher than that! On the other hand, you get points for broad daylight, an open field and ploughing ... talk about multi-tasking!<br><br>Still boggling at the thought of 226 men in cardigans, let alone 226 thousand. All the men I know would rather stick pins in their eyes than be seen dead in one. Do I REALLY put all my heroines in cardigans, Kate??? What a mortifying thought. I will have to be more careful. I concede the shoes - although they usually go in because I like my heroines to have a "thing", and it always seems that shoes is one a lot of women can identify with. Sometimes they have a thing for chocolate or puddings instead, although personally both leave me cold. I think one of the reasons I'm struggling with my current book is because I haven't yet worked out what Miranda's 'thing' is yet. Must give this some thought - but clearly, it's not going to be shoes OR cardigans this time!<br><br>Persuasion is my favourite too, Michelle. The BBC did an absolutely wonderful production a few years ago with Amanda Root and Ciaran Hinds, and no artificial lighting or make up. Fabulous.<br><br>Last thing - I've been trying to work out what MH stands for, Kate? I feel sure it's something blindingly obvious, but am still puzzled!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Friday, March 07, 2008
Mansfield Park was one of the set texts in my first year at uni, Michelle. I was the only one who loathed it, and I made myself a promise that I'd try re-reading every 10 years to see if I'd grown into Austen. (So far, no.)<br><br>I do have a soft spot for Victorian melodramas (John Halifax, Gentleman is a goodie, as is East Lynne ... and George Moore's "Esther Waters" is very powerful, too). I wonder if that's why I like writing tearjerkers so much? Amelia Opie is a Norwich author who specailised in tearjerkers (I like her books, too - and I've been very naughty recently and bought myself some first editions. The excuse is that it was research for 'Heroes, Villains and Victims of Norwich' - legitimate tax deduction there - but I do have a yen to write her biography...). <br><br>Jessica, MH = Modern Heat. But you've managed to shock me. Puddings and chocolate leave you cold??? You have to come and stay with me... and I'll corrupt you :o) <br><br>50 books in October is still 50 books this year, and I think it deserves a big fuss. I too believe in making celebrations last (which is why my birthday always stretches to at least two weekends, if not three). <br><br>Men in cardigans... um. No, that's middle-aged and unsexy. Unlike those pretty, lacy confections aka shrugs which are really cardigans in disguise. Or something in cashmere...

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Friday, March 07, 2008
MH ... Modern Heat ... of COURSE. Duh. <br><br>Very sorry to have let you you down on the chocolate front, but I'm afraid I just don't do sweet, in any shape or form (except for puppies and kittens, naturally!) Sometimes I feel a little left out, especially re chocolate, as if not being bothered about it somehow makes me not a real woman, but perhaps it's just as well. God knows what size I'd be if crammed in puddings on top of everything else I eat! <br><br>I am really stuck on my book at the moment (hence all this blogging) and feeling very fretful as a result. I just can't settle to it, am too distracted by other stuff that's going on, and now am starting to slip behind my schedule, which is just making me worse. Do you ever suffer from the dreaded block, Kate, or do you not have any time to waste with it on your writing schedule? I normally have to force myself to write through it, but I wondered if you had any tips on regaining focus? Am about to go and walk the dog, to see if that helps!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate on Friday, March 07, 2008
Probably about the same size as me *g* <br><br>Sorry to hear you're stuck. I think we all go through phases like this - weirdly, a lot of people I know seem to be going through a distracted phase (including me). Tips to get round it... Depends if you're a planner or a seat-of-the-pants writer, really. I'm a planner so I know what's meant to happen, and that helps - for that, I'll break the outline into chapters and flesh out the scenes a bit more, and that normally gets me working (even if it's smack in the middle of chapter 3 instead of the beginning of chapter 1). <br><br>Other suggestions: walk the dog, grab a kitchen timer and make yourself write something for 30 minutes without re-reading or editing it (on the basis that it's easier to fix a bad page than a blank page), have a long bath, or just bribe yourself through it (as you don't do chocolate I can't suggest that one, but maybe x number of words = a glass of wine tonight, or 1 chapter = you can watch a good film). Or flick through a magazine, see if something catches your eye that could affect your plot or the main conflict (and that will make it feel fresher to you and maybe tempt you to work on it).<br><br>What I wouldn't advise is what I'm doing at the moment. Playing Sudoku and doing word puzzles under the guise of "I'm thinking..." :o) (These revisions MUST be done for Monday!)<br><br>

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Nell Dixon on Friday, March 07, 2008
One of my heroines had a thing for jewelery, she had a toe ring, pierced navel and a passion for ear rings. I play a lot of spider solitaire when I'm stuck and oddly spend time surfing the M&S website looking at clothes I don't need, can't afford and would never fit me. It seems to work though.

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Jessica on Saturday, March 08, 2008
Great tip about the M&S website, Nell - must try that! Things are getting so bad here that I'm even thinking about cleaning the house, but a bit of internet surfing sounds a much better displacement activity.<br><br>Kate, I nodded sagely as I read through your advice - all good - and have been laughing ever since at the image of you playing Sudoku! I'd better let you get on with those revisions, but just wanted to thank you for a fabulous blog, and for dropping by so often when you've got all that "thinking" to do. You've been an absolute star. <br><br>Thank you everyone who's stopped by this week, in fact. It'll just be me next week, I'm afraid, but I'll be welcoming Liz Fielding in April, so do come back then, if not before!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By Kate Hardy on Monday, March 10, 2008
Nell - ah, yes, the joys of spider solitaire. And then there's clothes-shopping for my heroine, and finding the engagement or wedding ring..<br><br>Jessica - ouch, if cleaning is looking better than writing! And thank you very much for having me. I've really enjoyed it. Congratulations again on your marvellous milestone!

Re: Introducing Kate Hardy...    By nicole on Thursday, March 27, 2008
hi


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 
  

 

  

 
  

  Minimize

Larger Print Books

 Print   

Blog
  

Home|About Me|My Books|Pick Your Own - Round Two!|Where Are You?|Blog|Ask Me|